How Can Vince Mcmahon Prevent Tna From Better Ratings?

Category: Q+A 
Tags: , , , , ,

Because TNA beated SD/ECW ratings & TNA only has one brand How does wwe lose to that

  • Share/Bookmark

Comments

12 Responses to “How Can Vince Mcmahon Prevent Tna From Better Ratings?”

  1. Brian U on October 17th, 2009 4:15 pm

    IDK. I’m a TNA fan and think that it’s way better than the WWE. But i doubt that Vince is worried about TNA right now. TNA had a chance to beat ECW in the ratings because ECW drew a 1.1 but instead TNA doesn’t do anything out of the ordinary and draw a .87 so in my opinion, Vince doesn’t give a damn about TNA.

  2. ŁŐĢĄП on October 17th, 2009 4:15 pm

    TNA isn’t even a worry of McMahon’s right now.
    The program sucks, the talent sucks, and can’t matchup to RaW now, or really ever.

  3. stevieje on October 17th, 2009 4:15 pm

    TNA has a lot of old school athletes who Vince thought were hasbeens and obviously are not. Vince needs to listen to us fans more. He should have started a complete seperate federation from WWE.

  4. THE PEOPLES CHAMP on October 17th, 2009 4:15 pm

    vince would need to have 1 roster, have all of the legends come back, and bring all of the talented wrestlers from TNA come 2 vince

  5. Rick T on October 17th, 2009 4:15 pm

    TNA looks like its videotaped in someones house

  6. Ryan M on October 17th, 2009 4:15 pm

    Push his young talent. If he does that he will crush TNA.

  7. Charlie Mac on October 17th, 2009 4:15 pm

    Vince doesnt even need to worry about TNA

  8. Akoo on October 17th, 2009 4:15 pm

    TNA & ECW suxs!

  9. BREAK YOUR BACK, MAKE YOU HUMBLE on October 17th, 2009 4:15 pm

    TNGay

  10. Rated R Diva on October 17th, 2009 4:15 pm

    I agree with the person above me. Having 2 rosters gets old. You see the same match week after week after week. They could better utilize their wrestlers if they competed on all shows, and had new feuds and didn’t show the same things over and over again.
    WWE is too repetitive.. they need to spice things up and give the fans something to want to watch. They also need to make ECW “extreme” again, or else get rid of it entirely. I think that’s a big turn off to fans and one reason why TNA would definitely beat ECW in ratings. It’s much better than ECW. ECW is a sham…
    Smackdown, has a bad time slot.. and is on a bad channel.. a lot of people don’t get CW and it’ll be even worse on MyNetworkTV.
    They don’t need to worry about TNA yet.. but I’m sure several years down the road, they’ll have some real competition on their hands. People want to see wrestling… not these idiotic storylines over and over again. Also, look at their Knock-Outs division! Why can’t WWE do that with the Divas? Instead they make them parade around and have pillow fights.

  11. Ian M on October 17th, 2009 4:15 pm

    WWE is too diluted now. They need to unify the rosters again and cut away all the dead weight. Having Raw and Smackdown each with individual rosters was about the dumbest move they ever made.

  12. NOBEL ONE on October 17th, 2009 4:15 pm

    To the guys who said that there should be one roster instead of three RAW, Smackdown, and ECW are wrong, but right at the same time. They did that because each show is supposed to be unique and different, like one world on each show. Besides they combined this because they wanted each wrestler to have air time to wrestle to showcase their talent and not just the top but also the midcarders. Theres too many wrestlers already if all three were to be combined.
    Right now WWE is better, People have to learn not to be spoiled, RAW, SMACKDOWN, and ECW are like three different shows, whereas TNA is only one.
    Anyways TNA will be big someday.
    Also WWE and TNA will get better, and why not, a little competion doesnt hurt right…

Got something to say?