How Many Of You Prefer Tna Wrestling To Wwe?

18 Responses to “How Many Of You Prefer Tna Wrestling To Wwe?”

1. revman_2 on June 2nd, 2009 10:13 pm

   I like TNA better cause it stays true to wrestling, WWE has turned into a Three Ring Circus show for little kids, that’s not what it’s supposed to be about. It’s supposed to be about the wrestling, and putting on great matches and great ORIGINAL storylines, not the same crap over and over like WWE shows.

2. unit ® on June 2nd, 2009 10:13 pm

   i first thought you meant tiits and aasss
   Well thats what i prefer

3. I'll Take That One! on June 2nd, 2009 10:13 pm

   I love the promos in TNA.

4. VIGO123 on June 2nd, 2009 10:13 pm

   TNA is “terrible”, it’s the bone yard of WWE. Kirk Angle was going to improve it, but it doen’t seem to have done any good. Vince McMann “rules sports entertainment”, but I guess in the world of Saks and Macy’s you have to have a K-mart and a Wal-Mart to.

5. Nadash13 on June 2nd, 2009 10:13 pm

   tna is really corny! they are such wanna-be’s!

6. xzone fan.. on June 2nd, 2009 10:13 pm

   i like tna it better then vine getting his butt kissed i like sting.

7. mauiman2 on June 2nd, 2009 10:13 pm

   I like the ideas TNA has, but storylines are awful and the action is kind of a spotfest. They need to slow it down and relax a little more. Not to mention, the ring needs to go. It’s always been a 4-sided ring, no need to change it.

8. hidoug on June 2nd, 2009 10:13 pm

   ……I think its a sport for pansies….to show of their muscles and pretend to hit each other …..try watching boxing instead of cabaret….

9. Larbrado on June 2nd, 2009 10:13 pm

   WWE! WWE! WWE!

10. WWE Champ on June 2nd, 2009 10:13 pm

    I don’t mind both.

11. RKO&Edge fan on June 2nd, 2009 10:13 pm

    I just like wwe better

12. Wanderer on June 2nd, 2009 10:13 pm

    The only wrestling worth watching is old school WWF…the new stuff is garbage

13. Aceman on June 2nd, 2009 10:13 pm

    I think TNA is putting out better story lines. I still think Vince Russo is the best writer out ther. WWE and preferably Smackdown is doing better in that dept. Michael Hayes is really bringing SD around. If Raw would get some more talent they could dominate again. Especially if they would stay away from matches like Trump vs. Rosie (GAG). RAW has about 3 Superstars carrying the whole Shbang. HBK, Edge, and Orton.The others are helping some or are dead weight.

14. Unanswered Prayers on June 2nd, 2009 10:13 pm

    No, I never seen it

15. man_of_m on June 2nd, 2009 10:13 pm

    What’s the difference? They’re both so fake I change the station after about 10 secs. Old school WWF (80′s-early 90′s) rules.

16. jacj ainshowor's friend Ralp on June 2nd, 2009 10:13 pm

    tna is so fake u can see on t.v. they dont even come close to hitting them and who can withstand a bat?

17. Cruel Angel on June 2nd, 2009 10:13 pm

    I prefer their wrestling style much more over WWE. It’s a faster pace, and most of their wrestlers have better move sets than the WWE stars. Vince doesn’t like fast and high flying, technical stuff… he likes the big guy bodybuilder bruisers. The cruiserweights are not considered that important, whereas the X Division in TNA is on the same level as the others. Furthermore, most of the main stars in any area of TNA are more normal looking, even the champs.
    I definitely think the better promos and humor is over in TNA as well. WWE can still do decent segments, but it’s more hit and miss. TNA… I think Eric Young is comedy gold, and I’ve loved how Eye Spy Productions has evolved into its humor role as well. I think TNA has better promos overall, and have more of an old school feel to them.
    I watch RAW, SD, TNA (even WSX)… but the one I look forward to the most is TNA.

18. jamaican babe on June 2nd, 2009 10:13 pm

    I watch them both and enjoy both of them but I still prefer the wwe.

Got something to say?