If The Attitude Era Never Exsisted And The Storylines Used Never Happened, Would Wwe Be Where They Are Today?

6 Responses to “If The Attitude Era Never Exsisted And The Storylines Used Never Happened, Would Wwe Be Where They Are Today?”

1. σnє smαrt cσσkíє™ on October 10th, 2009 10:03 pm

   It could be. The Attitude Era was WWE/F’s most successful era. If it never happened, TNA would probably be the one we’re mostly talking about right now.

2. MK on October 10th, 2009 10:03 pm

   If the attitude never happened… WCW would still be ruling TV wrestling, ECW would’ve made it to the big time & WWE would NEVER have made it big like it did

3. NOBEL ONE on October 10th, 2009 10:03 pm

   probably not, the attitude era still lives in some believe or not.

4. CenaTM on October 10th, 2009 10:03 pm

   I think it would be the same as it is Today.

5. JIGSAW! on October 10th, 2009 10:03 pm

   Yeah! The WWE/F is known for it’s Attitude Era. If “that” never existed, if guys like Steve Austin, Undertaker, The Rock, and Mick Foley (A.K.A Mankind, Dude Love, and Cactus Jack) never existed, TNA would be talked about alot more than WWE!
   ONE LAST THING: The Wrestling Section was mostly made because of the WWE/F. The Attitude Era!

6. Young Money(im the illest) on October 10th, 2009 10:03 pm

   Nope the attitude era was created to compete against WCW right before the attitude era started WWE was going down close to going under out of business at the time WCW was more edgier with the NWO and people like that style and it got more viewers cuz most fans grew tired of the kiddish acts then the rebels started to get cheered by the fans instead of the good ol guys WWE took that phislophy and used it to get edgier a rebel like austin got over with heel antics it was a new movement in wrestling from kids to edgy adult things but without the attitude era we would be talking about WCW instead of WWE

Got something to say?