What Is Your View And Opinion On The Difference Between The Wwf: Attitude Era And The Wwe Era?
What is the difference between both Era’s of this business? Which one do you favor over the other? Why?
Defend your position and try to have evidence (a source at least) to prove your position. (Not neccessary, but would be great to know).
Comments
6 Responses to “What Is Your View And Opinion On The Difference Between The Wwf: Attitude Era And The Wwe Era?”
Got something to say?
Women of Wrestling
Recent Updates
- John cena and devon graye train for “legendary”
- Wwe raw 8/30/10 part 7/12
- Wwe smackdown 03/09/10 3/10
- Wwe smackdown 03/09/10 2/10
- Wwe smackdown 03/09/10 4/10
Blogroll
Recent Comments
- bobwal4life on Part 1 WWE Wrestlemania 26 Results Undertaker Ends Shawn Michaels Career
- 86fija on Part 1 WWE Wrestlemania 26 Results Undertaker Ends Shawn Michaels Career
- MyNameIsMas17 on Part 1 WWE Wrestlemania 26 Results Undertaker Ends Shawn Michaels Career
- skullz5 on Part 1 WWE Wrestlemania 26 Results Undertaker Ends Shawn Michaels Career
- 234ULTRA on Part 1 WWE Wrestlemania 26 Results Undertaker Ends Shawn Michaels Career
attitude era was aimed at teen/adults. You could tell by the storylines and wrestling skills were actually important. Vince cared about the business. Now WWE is more of a kids show.. Wrestling itself is not very important anymore all Vince cares about is the money. Crappy storylines made it a kids show, because kids give rating and rating gives money. So we old-school fans are doomed…
Hopefully things will change sometime..
the attitude era i think was the best. they pushed as much limits as they could and it wasnt as predictable as today. it seems like now that they dont have the competition the did with wcw, they just dont care much now. its very predictable and somewhat boring now. the whole million dollar give away was a plot to get people to watch raw but in actuality if they would go with the risky sh*t like they used to, it would draw viewers.
still like and watch the wwe every week but its not like it used to be!!!
lol i swear you and your questions man.. always gotta think deep huh? lol heres my un-thoughtful answer kuz im just freestyling my thoughts here >_<
well i think the attitude had more drama to it due to the war with wcw and that they had to do what it took to take wcw down (in ratings) and um i think there were more mid carders then today .. everyone is going to say storylines storylines and STORYLINES BUT! its like a movie.. once its been done.. its either you do it again to make it better or you just leave it.. storylines usually repeat.. but really though, do you honestly think they can think bout soo many newer ideas that havent been done before? idk just sayin
EDIT! sorry i got no source right now and lol at the first answer… that prob deserves a thumbs down for no complete answer..
The WWE era is more aimed towards kids. The Attitude Era was aimed at adults from the ages of 18-34 (although a lot of kids watched it anyway). I like the Attitude Era because it was edgy, unpredictable, and wasn’t afraid to push the envelop.
Is it milk or dark chocolate
Don’t Care…