Why Are Wwe Marks Such Big Hyocrites Of Tna? | Wrestling Gods

Why Are Wwe Marks Such Big Hyocrites Of Tna?

Its not like WWE doesnth ave stupid storylines (Kane Triple H, Donald Trump, Limo, Mayweather. and then they dont even give TNA a chance it is barely 6 years old, thats nothing.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. I Want To Join Tna But Do They Choose Height Or Skill?
  2. Do You Like Donald Trump Being Written Into The Storyline In Wwe?
  3. This Is The Reason Why Wwe Sucks Now But Tna Rules. What Do You Think?
  4. This Is The Main Reason Why Wwe Is Starting To Suck And Why Tna Rules! What Do You Think?
  5. Why Is It That One Not So Good Show Is All It Takes To Convince A Wwe Fan That Tna “sucks”?

Comments

9 Responses to “Why Are Wwe Marks Such Big Hyocrites Of Tna?”

  1. ultimoja on November 26th, 2009 10:16 pm

    They hate TNA in general which means they will hate anything tna does cause its not wwe.

  2. Greg K on November 26th, 2009 10:16 pm

    I keep telling people – stop trying to understand marks. You’ll just give yourself a headache.

  3. wwe fanatic$$$ (TOWWFFC) on November 26th, 2009 10:16 pm

    I don’t know!!!

  4. MN HEAT Is a Sax Machine on November 26th, 2009 10:16 pm

    I don’t know, but TNA has taken the “male soap opera” concept to the extreme in recent weeks. “As the Angles Turn” really? I used to tune in to TNA to watch great wrestling, but now I get f’n WWE lite. I still watch TNA, as well as all the WWE shows, but TNA used to be an alternative. It seems to me that they are trying too hard to be like WWE. They need to go back to what got them on Spike in the first place, great wrestling that lived up to the name “Total Nonstop Action.” They also need to stop making a fool of the X Division.

  5. Ming P on November 26th, 2009 10:16 pm

    TNA had chance to grow with guys like AJ, Joe and etc. Addition of Cage was great but addition of Angle is not. After Angle got there, it start the downhill because TNA’s keep pushing the ex-WWE guys and not their own. i would much prefered Joe get the heavyweight title but they wont give to him yet. Dont TNA mark say the same?
    intern of storyline, yeah sometimes stupid maybe but atleast they dont copy TNA, in fact the opposite. (Week after DX was reformed, TNA use a couple of ex-DX members to form a group called Voodo Kin Mafia -AKA-VKM) want more example? TNA got gimmicky, the death bed match is similar to Last ride match.

  6. Danny K - Fatalityy on November 26th, 2009 10:16 pm

    Its about the ratings.
    And the wrestlers.
    One promblem, Awsome Kong.
    Did you see she almost broke that poor girls neck yesterday? She doesnt even care about saftey. She’s so overrated. They need to kick her off. People like her make me want to stop watching tna.

  7. BREAK YOUR BACK, MAKE YOU HUMBLE on November 26th, 2009 10:16 pm

    I’m critical of both WWE and TNA, because I see better wrestling in Japan, and the Indies.

  8. Brian U on November 26th, 2009 10:16 pm

    Yes. It’s because they don’t give TNA a chance. All they do is look at the six sided ring, and the iMPACT! zone and think that this is a horrible poor wrestling company. Another thing they do is they see the former WWE superstars and say that TNA is just a rip off of the WWE with nothing but hasbeens. Even though the so called “hasbeens” were champions in the WWE, now all of a sudden they come to TNA now they are hasbeens. And the thing is, they worship guys like Chris Jericho, HHH, The Undertaker, Edge, CM Punk, and they all came from different wrestling promotions, but you don’t see them calling Chris Jericho a WCW hasbeen, same with HHH, and the Undertaker. In fact Edge was also a former WCW wrestler, but he’s not a hasbeen to the WCW. And for CM Punk, i believe he came from the TNA before going to the WWE, so can we call him a TNA hasbeen? Then people look at SharkBoy and Black Machismo, and say that they are ripping off the WWE. Well guys guess what, do ya remember Gillberg, well he was a rip off of WCW’s Goldberg. But we never said that the WWF is trying to rip off the WCW. And our fellow Kane, before he got the Kane gimmick, he wrestled as “The Fake Diesel” which was supposed to be a fake version of The Diesel Kevin Nash when he left the WWF for WCW. So just give TNA a chance. It’s alot better than the WWE anyways. Just because you see guys trying to be like past WWE superstars, doesn’t mean that they are trying to be like the WWE, it’s just having fun with the competition. Sorry so long. i had to get my point across. TNA=5 1/2 years old. WWE= 60+ years old. Give TNA a chance.

  9. Jason D. on November 26th, 2009 10:16 pm

    The governer of Minnesota above me said it exactly as I would have said it. I loved TNA for the WRESTLING, not the stupid storylines that all of the sudden, they are coming up with. TNA has superior athletes, as opposed to the lumbering big men of the WWE. No slam on WWE, I love to watch both products, but TNA was supposed to offer something different than the stuff that we have been used to seeing the last few years. The X-Division, which used to be the main reason to watch TNA, is now a joke. Why??? Let the superior athletes of TNA show off their skills in the ring instead of trying to cut forced, stupid,and poorly scripted promos in the back. Bring back the old TNA I say!!! Who is with me????

Got something to say?





Powered by Yahoo! Answers