Why Doesn’t Tna Advertise Where Bound For Glory Is Going To Be At?
TNA is getting better at advertising where their shows will be held at. But my question is that Bound For Glory is supposed to be their biggest ppv, like wrestlemania is to WWE. So why don't try to get a venue now and then advertise it now so by the time Bound For Glory comes by they would have sold out the arena? It makes sense right?
Related posts:
- Tna bound for glory 2009 4/18 (hq)
- The Eyes of a Blog: Day 78 – Day 84 | Update on the Tara incident at TNA’s Bound for Glory PPV | TNA Bound for Glory Results 10/18/09 | Injury Updates On Christopher Daniels & Suicide, Kim Couture Comments On Tara | Jim Ross Previews Bragging Rights, Discusses His WWE Future/TNA Rumors, and more |
- Bound for glory 2009 now on dvd
- Tna bound for glory 2008 highlights
- Footage from tna’s bound for glory 2009
Comments
2 Responses to “Why Doesn’t Tna Advertise Where Bound For Glory Is Going To Be At?”
Got something to say?




Right now TNA is just following an age old formula and that’s “If it works, why change it?”. At this time I don’t think TNA has the budget to rent out and perform in large venues like the ones WWE does. They need time to grow still and then they can begin to do larger tours and larger arenas.
It does make sense for them to begin promoting their Bound For Glory even if the card isn’t decided yet. It could be a hype video showing events from the past ones or anything really. Just something to tease the audiece at remind them of how important it is. However, like I said above, I don’t think that TNA has the funds to rent a larger venue. On the other hand though sometimes you have to take a risk. If everything went right I’d love to see TNA establish themselves in other places and start to grow even bigger. We’ll see what happens in the near future.
TNA usually only announce PPV locations like 2 months before the actual event.