You Really Think That There Is Gonna Be A Tna Vs Wwe Pay Per View?

22 Responses to “You Really Think That There Is Gonna Be A Tna Vs Wwe Pay Per View?”

1. Hey Yo Chico on September 15th, 2009 4:04 pm

   never

2. brandyn n on September 15th, 2009 4:04 pm

   doubt it.

3. A D on September 15th, 2009 4:04 pm

   probably not

4. perez.za on September 15th, 2009 4:04 pm

   i think sooo

5. crystal t on September 15th, 2009 4:04 pm

   Not quite TNA vs WWE.
   TNA has taken over two of WWE’s pay-per-view dates. As things stand right now, Turning Point will be held on December 2nd and Final Resolution will be held on January 6th. WWE had originally booked both of those dates for December To Dismember & New Year’s Revolution, but decided to discontinue those events.

6. Annoyed on September 15th, 2009 4:04 pm

   ill say this once and only once:COMPARED TO WWE,TNA IS IN THE MINOR LEAGUES.
   the answer to yure question is yes,its gonna happen when wwe buys a bankrupt tna and then bring it back as a fourth brand,even dorkier than ECW and then the TNA CHAMPION IS GONNA BE JAMIE NOBLE,and tna will be a cruiserweight show,i cant wait for that.

7. amit s on September 15th, 2009 4:04 pm

   Never. I have watched wrestling for 32 years. It’s not going to happen.

8. BMXpert (J.M.) on September 15th, 2009 4:04 pm

   No. There won’t. TNA can’t take that kind of chances.
   Actually, in December 6th and December 27th there will be a Head-to-head between WWE’s ECW ant TNA’s Impact. The reason is that Sci Fi will feature a Christmas TV Series marathon at 6 and at 25, so that’s the reason. I think ECW will win, because Impact ratings is sthicken.
   About PPV HeadtoHead, there’s no way. May be later, but not now.

9. The Hitman on September 15th, 2009 4:04 pm

   Absolutely not. TNA would be the only one that would benefit from it. Vince isn’t going to help get them recognition. They want to directly compete with WWE. Helping someone that wants to put him out of business wouldn’t be wise.

10. carna69 on September 15th, 2009 4:04 pm

    That will never happen

11. jamaican babe on September 15th, 2009 4:04 pm

    COULD BE.

12. ra162978 on September 15th, 2009 4:04 pm

    wwe is way better than tna i think everyone knows that

13. ryan c on September 15th, 2009 4:04 pm

    maybe

14. Do Work snooky! on September 15th, 2009 4:04 pm

    Only if Vince McMahon wants to create a scripted feud of that sort after he purchases TNA..

15. Reyfan#1 on September 15th, 2009 4:04 pm

    didn’t the last time TNA and WWE meet vince sued them to prevent them from airring a video of TNA pressence at a wwe event in Miami. So why would he endorse something he is already against when there feeding off of his scraps and pooching his people.

16. Tyler™ on September 15th, 2009 4:04 pm

    NOOOOOO…..
    No way the writers would get along.
    Not unless Vince has purchased TNA which would mean Booker wouldn’t have been signed, not going to happen.

17. THE OUTLAW on September 15th, 2009 4:04 pm

    Yep, and the Pope ain’t Catholic.

18. kenrayf on September 15th, 2009 4:04 pm

    Who ever told you this was obviously falling into a rumour. It won’t happen now and probably not for a while if never.

19. Christopher R on September 15th, 2009 4:04 pm

    That Would Be Very Cool but HELL NO!!!!!!!!!!!!, TNA Would Lose Badly cause WWE Has A Bigger Fan Base

20. SONA MA GUN ( AJ Styles 4 Champ) on September 15th, 2009 4:04 pm

    uhhh…no. i highly doubt that. misinformed guy

21. Rocco G on September 15th, 2009 4:04 pm

    I doubt it. There rivalries. When the WCW was around they never had a pay per view with the WWE.

22. kim_in_c on September 15th, 2009 4:04 pm

    no tna’s is the second and armageddon is the 16th

Got something to say?